Are women better rulers than men? Essay

This argu workforcet on the question are wo manpower better rulers than men? Will focus on the subject of Elizabeth I compared to the average of male rulers.It more often than non depends which era you live in, in mod times it would really not fresh up much of a difference as both genders are considered equal. But in the Tudor era, looking at it from the present, a female would definitely harbour had the velocity hand, but from the common perspective of quite a little in the Tudor times a female would have been considered lower, for a occur of reasons, the main one being, female rulers were mantic to have a husband to coif the decisions for them, while the poove got on producing a male heir. Because it was lady-like in those times. The definition for lady-like because was to be quiet, sit in a corner be submissive to males and not be able to do either thing for themselves.That really did challenge Elizabeth in the start as her parliament unploughed pestering her toT here were a number of traits that Elizabeth alike had that made her more successful than others. iodine of them was she was fluent in 6 languages her indigen English, French, Italian, Spanish, Greek, and Latin. Later she came to terms with a snack of german. They became very useful to her in unusual plolitical situations such as when shemade an alliance with France. The St Bartholomews Day Massacre, in which thousands of French Protestants (Huguenots) were killed, forced the alliance but did not ramify it. Elizabeth even began marriage negotiations with Henry, Duke of Anjou , and afterwards with his younger brother Franois, Duke of Anjou and Alenon.Another was that she was a on the nose ruler and upheld the law, when she wanted, she could be ruthless (such as when the earl of essex p lapted to overthrow her she had him put to death immediately)but at times she can be pitying (like when she captured her half sister mary she unploughed transferring her from keep to keep f or 18 days until she ordered her execution. Although some label this was because she was postponement for enough evidence to execute her if she executed her too early a lot of people would view her as a martyr).She was as well very brave at the beginning of the sapnish armada, when she was 55, she deleivered a speech to her men on horseback wearing light armour, with no guard or munificent escort, only her pages. (some saw this as foolery)She was also trained partially in fencing, as part of her fitness. Women didnt usually participate in any physical activity.she could also be very rude to noblemenShe also neer married and is commonly called the virgin queen (thither is some speculation about this) numerous say that not marrying was the key to her success, it meant that she had no loyalties to anyone but the people of england, but she did have the loyalties of many men who she kept toying with letting them call they were all in with a chance of marrying her and so did nig h everything she asked.This proved she was a talented manipulater. It is also said that she never married because she was mentally scarred from the treatment of her fathers wives and how he had kill hers and feared that the same might happen to her. Others say that she never married because she was deeply rabid about Robert Dudley and she could not marry him for a number of reasons cheifly because he was extremly unpopular with the parliament because his family was a long line of imp nobles.Over all I think that elizabeth proved that women are very much better rulers than men as there is no other monarchs time of control that was called THE GOLDEN AGE1.Bibliographyhttp//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_I_of_England